Corporate News Feed
THERMOCON

Thermal Robustness in Cold Chain Packaging: Finding the Right Fit for Your Thermal Shipment

Share:

Table of Content

Thermal robustness refers to the resilience of thermal packaging against fluctuations in external temperatures, a critical factor in maintaining product integrity during shipping and storage. In cold chain logistics, where temperature-sensitive products are transported, maintaining the correct temperature range is paramount. Failure to do so can compromise product efficacy.

Cooling Solutions in Cold Chain Logistics

In the realm of cold chain logistics, there exists a variety of cooling solutions with almost identical payload space and running times, but differing in cost, external dimensions and packaging weight. This raises a pertinent question for customers: Why do these seemingly similar performing thermal solutions come with different price points, sizes and weights? And which thermal packaging solution do I need?

Cost, Size, and Weight Discrepancies

The disparities in cost, size and weight among different cooling solutions are influenced by several factors:

  • Materials Used: Advanced materials such as phase change materials (PCMs) and vacuum insulation panels (VIPs) can offer superior thermal protection but are more expensive than traditional materials like expanded polystyrene (EPS).
  • Design and Construction: More intricate designs that optimize airflow and reduce thermal bridging can improve efficiency but add to the complexity and cost of the packaging.
  • Insulation Thickness: Thicker insulation provides better thermal resistance, potentially reducing the need for refrigerants but increasing the size and weight of the packaging.
  • Refrigerant Types: The choice of refrigerants, such as gel packs, dry ice, or phase change material, impacts both the weight and the cost of the solution.

Don’t make the Mistake to Oversimplify Thermal Packaging

It’s evident that there is no one-size-fits-all solution in cold chain packaging. Adopting a uniform approach can lead to resource wastage and unnecessary expenditure on features that might not be essential for every application. Additionally, labeling one cooling packaging solution as inherently “better” than another oversimplifies, comparing apples to oranges. Instead, the focus should shift towards understanding one’s own requirements. By doing so, it’s possible to select a cooling packaging solution that not only ensures the safe transportation of your sensitive products but also ensuring that resources are allocated only to the features and capabilities that are genuinely needed.

Understanding External Temperature Volatility

A key consideration in selecting the appropriate thermal packaging solution is the volatility and predictability of external temperatures. Different shipping routes and seasons can present varying temperature challenges:

  • Stable vs. Fluctuating Temperatures: For routes with stable temperatures, less robust and lighter solutions may suffice. However, for environments characterized by high temperature fluctuations, such as transitions from cold to hot climates or vice versa, a more robust system is necessary.
  • Predictable vs. Unpredictable Conditions: Accurate prediction of temperature patterns along the shipping route allows for optimized packaging. Conversely, unpredictable conditions demand a more versatile and robust solution that can handle a wider range of temperatures.

Our Climate Chamber Test Showcasing Thermal Robustness of different Thermal Packaging Solutions

The diagram showcases temperature curves from a climate chamber test, representing the thermal performance of various passive cooling packaging solutions with identical payload. Although having identical payload, each curve corresponds to a different packaging type, highlighting the impact of materials, thickness of insulation, cooling element types, their quantity and positioning within the box on thermal robustness against external temperature fluctuations.

High Performance Universal Solution (HPU)

  • Stable Temperature Level: Maintains a consistent internal temperature regardless of external fluctuations.
  • Longest Runtime: Exhibits the longest duration of effective cooling.
  • PCM Cooling Elements: Utilizes phase change materials for superior thermal regulation.
  • No Bench Time: Cooling elements do not require pre-conditioning.
  • Easy Loading: Simplified packing process.
  • Performance: Demonstrates a flat and stable temperature curve, indicating high thermal robustness.

High Performance Seasonal Solution (HPS)

  • Variable Temperature Level: Shows some internal temperature changes in response to external conditions.
  • Thermal Robustness: More thermally robust due to strategic placement of cooling elements.
  • Water-Based Cooling Elements: Uses water-based gels for cooling.
  • Thick Walls and High Cooling Mass: Enhanced insulation and cooling capacity.
  • Requires Bench Time: Cooling elements need to be pre-conditioned.
  • Performance: The temperature curve indicates moderate changes, reflecting adaptability and thermal inertia.

Low Budget Seasonal Solution (LBS)

  • Significant Temperature Changes: Internal temperature levels fluctuate noticeably with external temperature changes.
  • Stepwise Temperature Variations: Internal temperature shifts in stages parallel to external temperature changes.
  • Shortest Runtime: Least duration of effective cooling.
  • Water-Based Cooling Elements: Utilizes minimal water-based cooling elements.
  • Thin Walls and Low Cooling Mass: Least insulation and cooling capacity.
  • Requires Bench Time: Cooling elements need to be pre-conditioned.
  • Performance: The temperature curve exhibits clear steps corresponding to external changes, indicating lower thermal robustness.

The diagram illustrates that while HPU offers the highest thermal robustness and longest runtime, it is likely more expensive and heavier due to advanced materials and design. HPS provides a balance of robustness and cost, suitable for seasonal variations. LBS, while more cost-effective and lightweight, shows significant temperature fluctuations and the shortest runtime, highlighting the trade-offs in performance for lower costs. These differences emphasize the importance of selecting the right packaging solution based on specific application needs and environmental conditions.

Selecting the Perfect Fit in Thermal Packaging Solution

To ensure the safe transportation of sensitive products while avoiding unnecessary costs, consider the following steps:

  • Assess Product Sensitivity: Understand the specific temperature requirements and tolerances of the product being shipped.
  • Analyze Shipping Routes: Evaluate the environmental conditions along the shipping routes, including potential delays and temperature variations.
  • Evaluate Packaging Performance: Compare the thermal performance of different packaging solutions under simulated conditions that mimic the actual shipping environment.
  • Balance Cost and Efficiency: Weigh the benefits of advanced materials and designs against their costs to find an economically viable solution that meets the necessary thermal performance criteria.

By focusing on these factors, it is possible to select a cooling packaging solution that not only ensures the safe transportation of temperature-sensitive products but also optimizes the allocation of resources to essential features and capabilities.

In conclusion, understanding and implementing thermal robustness in cold chain packaging is crucial for maintaining product integrity during shipping and storage. There is no general best solution; instead, selecting the right packaging requires a detailed analysis of product needs, environmental conditions, and packaging capabilities. By doing so, businesses can achieve cost-effective and reliable temperature control throughout their supply chain.

More Posts
We advise you
Jetzt unverbindlich anmelden
Neuigkeiten bequem per E-Mail erhalten